Study on freight cost management: Transparency instead of rate maintenance
Freight cost management

Study on freight cost management: Transparency instead of rate maintenance

AEB study: Many companies struggle less with maintaining their rates than with a lack of transparency regarding freight costs. Find out why.

Manual processes still dominate freight rate management

In many companies, freight rates are still far from being used in a way that would be optimal for modern shipping and SAP processes. Instead of being organized and available early in the process, they are often scattered across rate sheets, carrier portals, local files, or separate systems.

This is precisely the picture painted by a recent AEB survey (see illustration) of 71 industrial and commercial companies. More than a third (35%) of respondents currently calculate freight rates manually using rate sheets, while 23% enter rates manually into their SAP system.

Why this could be problematic in SAP systems

The dominance of manual processes doesn't just mean a lot of work. It has an impact on many aspects of the logistics process. Freight costs are required not only after shipping today, but often much earlier. For example for the following:

  • Preliminary cost calculations
  • Selection of suitable shipping options
  • Internal settlement
  • Retroactive calculations
  • Analyses and evaluations

If freight rates are not up to date, consistent, or directly available within the SAP-related process, challenges arise: Decisions are made based on incomplete data. At the same time, the administrative burden is increasing - especially in multi-carrier environments with different rate models, surcharges, and service types.

How freight rates are determined in companies today
How freight rates are determined in companies today

The biggest cost driver: a lack of transparency regarding actual freight costs

An even more interesting picture emerges when looking at a second question: Which areas of freight cost management require the most effort today? The responses indicate a clear prioritization (see illustration).

What stands out is: The greatest pain does not lie in a single technical detail, but in the lack of visibility into actual freight costs.

This is highly relevant. After all, a lack of transparency has multiple consequences: It makes it hard to compare shipping options, cost control becomes tedious, retroactive calculations take longer, and logistics and controlling often work on different information levels.

What companies need now

The survey suggests that many companies aren't just looking for a better place to file their rates. They need a way to incorporate freight costs earlier in the process.

Three points are crucial here:

1. Freight rates must be up to date

Outdated rates can quickly lead to incorrect evaluations and unnecessary coordination effort.

2. Freight costs must be available in the right system

If the information is stored outside of SAP or outside the actual shipping process, its operational value decreases significantly.

3. Costs must be assessable early in the process

Only then can services, lead times, and prices be meaningfully compared.

This also shifts the focus of freight cost management: away from simply filing away rates, and toward a structured, process-oriented use of cost information.

What is the most time-consuming aspect of freight cost management?
What is the most time-consuming aspect of freight cost management?

Where the topic is headed

From our perspective, the survey reveals a clear trend: Freight cost management is increasingly becoming a matter of transparency and data availability.

Companies don't want to have to track transportation costs retrospectively. They want to be able to evaluate them as the process unfolds - right where decisions are made in SAP systems and in the shipping department.

This is exactly where the new freight rate features of AEB's Carrier Cloud for SAP solution come into play: AEB maintains and keeps a company's individual freight rates up to date; freight costs are made available early in the process and, for selected carriers, can even be used for early rate shopping.

The benefits: Less manual maintenance, a clearer overview, and a better basis for both operational and business decisions.

For more information about this solution, go to Multi-carrier shipping in SAP® and Freight Cost Management from AEB.