Urban myths, smart goldfish, and US export controls
Dispelling myths

Urban myths, smart goldfish, and US export controls

It’s amazing how often something I have believed for years turns out not to be true. Maybe our conventional wisdom about US export controls isn’t always right either?

My favorite myths

The repeated telling of stories lends them some kind of credence. We’ve heard it lots of times from lots of people, so it must be true. But, it ain’t necessarily so…  Here are a few of my favorite examples of myths that have been debunked (by the Scientific American, BBC, and ABC respectively):

  1. “NASA spent millions to develop a pen that would write in space, whereas Soviet cosmonauts used a pencil” 
  2. “Hair and fingernails continue to grow after death”
  3. “Goldfish have only a three-second memory”

Uncertainty about US export controls

It’s interesting that uncertainty often abounds in the export controls community. Most of us working in this area didn’t start our careers here. We didn’t go to university to study export controls and, quite a few of us got here by some kind of (hopefully!) happy accident. So, we’re often ‘self-taught’ and learn from each other in the community – at events, over discussion forums, etc. 

Thankfully, there are a lot of really great experts in the industry and excellent information is easily accessible online. But, there are still some urban myths out there and – especially for newcomers – it can be quite confusing to know right from wrong. Let’s look at a few myths that sometimes come up in discussion about US export controls.

Five common myths about US export controls

Myth 1: I’m not located in the US, so US export control regulations don’t apply to me

No matter where you’re based, US export control regulations are something you need to take into consideration. US law follows the goods so to speak, and therefore a company does not need to be located in the US to be subject to US export controls. The US government claims worldwide application of US export control laws (extraterritoriality) and seeks to penalize those who breach them, regardless of location.

Myth 2: We do not work in aerospace and defense, so US regulations do not apply to us

Export controls are not just about military goods. Although the aerospace and defense sector is undoubtedly a key focus area, controls are also in place for items, information, and software that are considered to be “dual-use” as they are primarily commercial or civil in nature, but also have potential military applications. Dual-use items may come from a wide variety of different industry sectors including telecommunications, electronics, chemicals, and computing and are categorized in the US in the Commerce Control List (CCL).

Myth 3: US export controls only relate to physical goods movements

The United States, in common with many other countries around the world, not only regulates the movement of controlled physical goods, but also the transfer of sensitive “technology” and software not in the public domain. The US government’s definition of “technology” is wide-ranging and can include instructions (written or recorded), blueprints, technical specifications, formulae, design drawings, models, operational manuals, and parts catalogues. In all likelihood, if the physical item itself requires a license, then the export of any corresponding software or technology is also likely to require a license, even if exported independently of the physical item.

Myth 4: I have national licenses already, so I do not need US licenses

The requirement to comply with US re-export controls is in addition to and separate from any national export controls legislation and licensing. A company could, for example, legally ship US controlled goods from the EU only using a valid national/EU license. From a US government perspective however, US re-export controls laws may have been violated given the extraterritorial reach of their regulations. Therefore companies need to ensure they have both national and US authorizations in place before shipping US controlled materials.

Myth 5: I cannot apply for a US license, therefore I do not need one

It is true that a non-US entity cannot apply for a US export license and would need an authorized US entity or broker to make the license application. An export license typically applies to the export of an article from the US, but consideration needs to be made of how subsequent re-exports outside the US are managed. These also need to be covered by a US license – either under the terms of the original license, or a new authorization (for example a general license or an exemption/exception).


Secure and efficient export controls with AEB

Export Controls from AEB automatically checks all your relevant transactions for license requirements and embargo restrictions worldwide. Ad hoc, fully automated, or company-specific. In the cloud or integrated in your ERP.

More information about US export controls

There is a lot of really good information available on US government websites such as those of the US Bureau of Industry and Security and the US Directorate of Defense Trade Controls. And our export control expert Dr. Ulrike Jasper shares very helpful guidance and tangible examples for how exactly and in which scenario US export controls may apply to you in her article EAR99, CCL, CCC, ECCN: Tips and checklists for export controls under US EAR.