Multi-carrier shipping software
Whether API or EDI - choosing the right interface not only influences IT, but also warehouse and shipping processes. This is an often underestimated factor that determines whether packages are sent seamlessly or processes come to a standstill.
The difference between API and EDI lies in the data transfer:
transfers data asynchronously via file.
works synchronously in real time.
This technical basis has a direct impact on process speed and flexibility.
Some carriers require an MRN before the label is printed via API. As the number only becomes available after customs clearance, the shipping process can be blocked.
With API interfaces, the total number of packages often has to be specified with the first label. In practice, this information is often only known during packaging.
APIs usually supply labels in a fixed resolution (e.g. 203 dpi) and often only as a PDF. With EDI, on the other hand, labels can be individually designed and provided in native language for almost all printer types - crucial for maximum speed where high volumes are needed.
APIs and EDIs each have clear advantages and limitations. While APIs offer fast integration and flexibility, EDI scores particularly well for high volumes thanks to its stability and printing speed. It is crucial that the digital connection adapts to the logic of the warehouse processes - not the other way around.
APIs and EDIs each have clear advantages and limitations. While APIs offer fast integration and flexibility, EDI scores particularly well for high volumes thanks to its stability and printing speed. It is crucial that the digital connection adapts to the logic of the warehouse processes - not the other way around.