What is Sustainability?  What is Sustainable Manufacturing?  What is Sustainable Packaging?

The speaker line-up at the 2010 Packaging Strategies Sustainable Packaging Forum (September15-16; Phoenix, AZ) provided varied perspectives in making sense of these questions that are now front and center for modern manufacturers and brand owners seeking to stay competitive, modernize their infrastructure, and manage their costs.  The discussion topics focused mainly on Recycling, Bioplastics, and Product Labeling and an overriding theme of using Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) to measure multiple dimensions of sustainability – with an emphasis on climate change and green house gas (GHG) emissions.   Speakers represented nearly every point in the value chain including providers of raw materials (NatureWorks), brand owners (Kraft, SC Johnson, Mattel), retailers (Whole Foods), logistics providers (UPS), and recyclers (Waste Management).  Needless to say, the many perspectives illustrated the different interests that color the discussion.  What is clear is that (maybe not surprisingly), the question of “What is Sustainability?” is in fact unanswerable.  But it is obvious that this is a question that responsible organizations need to wrestle with systematically and do their best to create metrics on which to measure their progress.

 Looking at these issues from a packaging equipment technology perspective, LCA provides a good framework to articulate the sustainability benefits offered by a new technology that impacts the process energy consumed by a manufacturer (Scope 1), the electricity purchased by a manufacturer (Scope 2) and the indirect energy (Scope 3) consumed by key suppliers (e.g. raw materials providers) and during product distribution (e.g. refrigerated transportation and warehousing).  Beyond GHG emissions, it is also important to quantify other environmental impacts including water consumption, air pollution, and non-biodegradable waste generation.  Finally, when using LCA to compare the impacts of alternative technologies, it is vital to standardize based on units consumed by an end user, factoring in distribution chain loss and consumer waste.  Many speakers highlighted a point which we have observed in the past – the environmental footprint of the packaged product far exceeds that of the packaging.  The primary goal of packaging is to minimize damage and waste.

AEB works with our partners and customers to analyze both the economic and the environmental benefits of electron beam enabled systems.  AEB Blu solutions for aseptic packaging deliver compelling benefits from the perspective of process energy reductions, water footprint reductions, and package light-weighting.  Furthermore, by enabling a broader range of aseptic packaging solutions than possible with conventional chemical based sterilization, brand owners can develop more products that stay fresh on the shelf without the use of energy intensive cold-chain distribution. 

Advanced Electron Beams' CEO, Mitch Tyson, is interviewed in this GE Ecomagination CEO Series on the Mother Nature News Network.  Mitch speaks on AEB's technology, current and future applications for electron beams, and AEB's relationship with GE. 

I had the opportunity to speak on a panel at the Institute of Food Technologists’ annual Food Expo in Chicago on the subject of sustainability and the implications of climate regulation on the food and beverage industry.  The panel discussed the progress of formal climate legislation, the importance of developing more energy and water efficient approaches to farming and agriculture, voluntary carbon reporting and labeling programs for consumer goods, and consumers’ perception of sustainability.

Coming from the perspective of a packaging technology provider, AEB is feeling the pull from co-packers and brand owners for solutions that offer strong sustainability and economic value propositions.  The packaging research firm Mintel released a study earlier in the conference illustrating a lack of consensus among consumers on what defined sustainability.  Furthermore, they found that consumers preferred “sustainable” products, but were not willing to pay higher prices.  This sentiment is paralleled in the market for packaging technology equipment.

As we discussed in a recent webinar, AEB’s Blu sterilization technology enables greater sustainability as well as a superior Total Cost of Ownership when compared to conventional thermal or chemical based approaches.   With increasing pressure to show progress on common sustainability metrics such as carbon footprint reduction, water footprint reduction, and package light weighting, food and beverage packagers are considering advanced technologies for new filling capacity and for filling line retrofits. 

Download a copy of our IFT presentation here. 

 The mood at the annual ISPE Washington DC conference was one of cautious optimism.  The near halting of pharmaceutical manufacturing capacity expansion in 2009 has given way to new projects and the evaluation of new manufacturing technologies.  This optimism was tempered by impending consolidations in the industry and a still relatively meager drug pipeline.  That said, interest in new technologies for aseptic manufacturing remains a top interest.

The conference included a two-day forum on barrier isolation technology complete with case studies and new technology presentations.  Barrier isolators are used for aseptic manufacturing of injectable drug products, where primary packaging containers, including vials and syringes, are filled in a sterile filling environment with automated filling equipment.  The convenience and safety advantages offered by pre-filled syringes vs. traditional vials, such as the elimination of risk from contamination each time a dose is drawn from the vial, are driving significant market growth and demand for barrier isolator filling systems.  A recent report, Pre-Filled Syringes and Related Systems: World Market Outlook 2010-2025, forecasted continued double-digit growth rates in pre-filled syringes for a range of injectable products.  

AEB supplies low energy electron beam systems that sterilize containers of prefilled syringes.  Electron beam sterilization offers dramatic advantages over the conventional manual approach of spraying and wiping containers with a chemical sterilant.  Over the past two years, several barrier isolator systems equipped with AEB technology have been deployed and the first lines are ramping to full capacity.  Cilag AG of Switzerland delivered a case study documenting its deployment and ramp-up to production scale of a barrier isolator system from Metall+Plastic Gmbh that uses AEB's electron beam emitter technology.  They reported long runs with reliable sterilization performance from the electron beam tunnel with over 1500 hours of operation in a production environment.  This represents an important milestone in proving the efficacy of this application. 

The growing need for high performance sterilization technologies in the pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturing industries points to increased consideration in incorporating electron beam technology.   Electron beams provides a practical approach for aseptic transfer applications like prefilled syringe tub sterilization and a solution for direct sterilization of materials during packaging or aseptic manufacturing.  For more information, download our ebook here

Highlights included:
AEB's Dr. Anne Testoni presented work on characterizing the efficacy of electron beam treatment on 3-D objects. (Click here to download presentation)

AEB's Dr. Somchintana Norasetthekul had a paper published in the Radtech Report on AEB's collaboration with UMass Lowell to investigate the effects on low energy electron beam on typical plastics used in packaging.  (Click here to download paper)

AEB collaborator, Dr. George Sadler of Prove It LLC had a paper published on the use of low energy electron beam for active packaging applications.   (Click here to download paper)

AEB collaborator, Dr. Mike Laksin from Ideon LLC summarized recent developments in electron beam ink chemistries for food packaging applications.   (Click here to download paper)

The painful economics of food safety. Consumers attention to the safety of packaged foods is rising due to recent high profile issues related to 1) illness related to foodborne pathogens and 2) concerns over the use of BPA in many common packaging materials.  Brand owners are taking unprecedented steps to manage a brand's exposure to safety concerns.  Representatives from the USDA discussed the impending sweeping changes to US food safety regulation being promised in the upcoming food safety bill at the Food Summit. At the Global Pouch Forum, coating and adhesives provider Henkel Corporation discussed the economics of managing packaging safety concerns.

Corporate sustainability efforts are encouraging CPGs to reduce their environmental footprint and introduce new sustainable packaging concepts.  Paul Comey discussed Green Mountain Coffee's sustainability program that includes building demand for sustainable products and taking steps to protect the environment.  Speakers at the Global Pouch Forum discussed the sustainability benefits of flexible packaging vs conventional rigid or paperboard based packaging.  Allied Development presented data showing carbon footprint reduction of 30-40% from moving to pouch based packaging from cups or cans.

Consumers are demanding healthier options in single serve, shelf stable formats.  With growth in big box retailers, consumers are looking to buy cases of shelf stable products and refrigerate as needed.  The shift in demand is driving the growth of aseptic packaging approaches that deliver high quality shelf stable products without preservatives and without the thermal degradation of hot fill or heat based processes.  AEB partner Gualapack announced their plans to deploy an aseptic pouch filler for pre-formed Cheerpack spouted pouches. 

Technology investment is evolving in response to turbulent financial markets, volatile energy and raw material costs, and the growth in smaller run product lines.  As large brand owners launch niche brands to compete with a growing group of beverage entrepreneurs, the importance of co-packers is growing.  Rather than invest in a full aseptic filling line for a new product line, brand owners are more likely to work with a co-packer.  This allows CPGs to avoid large capital expenditures in exchange for paying slightly higher unit costs -  brand owners are better able to match expenses with revenues, enabling a larger number of niche brands to enter the market.  At the same time, those installations making capital investments are more apt to consider measures of Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) that include operating costs associated with energy and water treatment.

The combination of these trends supports the need for new packaging sterilization technologies for aseptic packaging.  AEB's Blu technology delivers chemical free packaging sterilization to aseptic food and beverage applications.  With a compelling TCO, Blu enabled filling solutions are enabling innovation across all packaging formats including bottles, closures, pouches, bag-in-box, and form fill seal applications.  For more information on Blu, click here.

As the attention and discussion increases around water footprints - the amount of water it takes to make the goods we consume - one message is becoming clear: the issue is not a trend.

This World Water Day (March 22) Jaymi Heimbuch of Treehugger used her observations across industries and companies, including at IBM and SABMiller, to argue that the water footprint is poised to become the next Energy Star label. But it's clear that companies are still navigating these waters with a sense of trepidation. They're seeking clear, universal reporting and measurement standards. The Water Footprint Network has stepped into this role and is scheduled to release an updated guidelines manual soon. Companies are also trying to determine the smartest and most cost-effective places to trim water use. Some are obvious - such as agriculture and electricity - but new areas are emerging where companies can eliminate or reduce water from a process, often driven by technology.

More efficient sterilization methods in the food and beverage industries are one example. On the average aseptic bottling line, our electron beam-based sterilization system saves 3 million gallons of water a year compared to traditional methods. When you consider a plant with five or six lines - that's a lot of water. Electron beams are just one example of a change in the process that significantly reduces water use.

We're working with small companies like UK-based FarmRight who are using electron beam systems to sterilize their unique single-serve packaging called Dairystix.  But it's the major food and beverage companies who are becoming vocal about water saving practices, helping increase consumer awareness. For example, PepsiCo is on track to meet its goal of reducing water consumption by 20% by 2015. Coca-Cola has made the same pledge and hopes to achieve it by 2012. Nestle has an extensive water section on its website where lays out a plan to reduce water consumption by 10-15% in the next five years.

What remains to be seen is which companies will emerge as leaders. Who will define the future of green manufacturing? Who will adopt the most innovative water-saving technologies? It's promising to see that the race has begun.

Microbial contamination in the food, health, and consumer product industries continues to be a critical issue for packaging companies, consumers, and regulators.  Aseptic processing of food and beverage packaging aims to ensure product package sterility at the the time the final package is sealed and presented to the outide world - ensuring that at the time the package is opened, there is no microbial contamination on the consumable product.  This approach relies on reliable and efficient technologies for sterilizing the incoming product, the incoming packaging material, the incoming air, as well as critical sufaces of machinery.  AEB has chemical free and water free solutions for sterilizing packageing materials and finished packages themselves, and we see signficant opportunity to address the challenges of critical surface sterilization as well.

The conditions in processing facilities, especially ones carrying out wet processes, are favorable environments for bacteria growth and attachment.  The complexity of processing equipment creates difficult-to-clean nooks and crannies that are perfect spots for bacteria growth that can escape sanitizing treatments.  Once bacteria attaches to surfaces, it is often very difficult to remove it completely using normal cleaning and sanitation procedures.

Currently, high temperature chlorinated water or various chemical sterilants are used to sanitize processing and aseptic packaging equipment.  Although effective, the practice has some significant disadvantages, including: the potential for the formation of toxic or carcinogenic compounds; the energy intensive nature of the process due to heat requirements; the persistence of chlorine in the environment after usage; and the requirement for special containers for transportation and storage of chlorine compounds. 

Electron beam technology has proven to be a safe and effective method for sterilization.  Novel configurations of electron beams can be leveraged to ensure sterility of problem areas of equipment.

• Nestle Launches Lightweight PET Bottle:  Already the leader in lightweighting single serve water bottles, Nestle has managed to reduce the PET resin weight of their water bottles by another 25%.  Additionally, they are pledging to develop water bottles produced entirely from recycled or renewable materials by 2020.  
  
• PepsiCo introduces lighter-weight, eco-friendly packaging in a new bottle for Propel fitness water: Pepsi successfully delivered the mechanical properties the market requires for a single serve sports drink while using 33% less material than the older design. PepsiCo makes the argument that from an energy savings perspective, this lightweighting is equivalent of taking 6,800 cars off the road.  
  
• Pepsico introduces a 10.9-g Eco-Fina bottle for Aquafina water: This new bottle design uses 50% less plastic than the bottle used in 2002.  In addition to changing the design, Pepsi now produces bottles at the same site as where they bottle the water, eliminating the carbon footprint and secondary packaging associated with logistics of producing in a separate location. 
  
• Abbott commits to global reduction in packaging: On the list of 40 sustainable packaging initiatives is bottle lightweighting and increasing the recycled content of their packaging. 
  
• Coca Cola recently began shipping product in its "Plant Bottle": The new design incorporates a blend of bioplastic with conventional PET packaging.  This approach is a more practical short term solution to improving sustainability through the use of bioplastics.
  
  

After finishing up 2009 with our major Blu announcement, everyone at AEB is excited about the New Year.  2010 already seems to quickly be distinguishing itself as Greentech Media's Michael Kanellos pointed out after a flurry of greentech VC activity last week. It's great to see this kind of momentum, which speaks volumes about the health of the clean technology industry as a whole.  

AEB CEO Mitch Tyson started the year with an issue that he's deeply invested in: The triple bottom line. It's not a new business philosophy, but one that is still evolving and that some companies want but haven't committed to. In his column entitled "Why The Triple Bottom Line Matters More Than Ever" on GreenBiz.com, Mitch explores the history of the triple bottom line, as well as the importance and benefits of pursuing sustainability in business.  Through his role with the New England Clean Energy Council and as a voice in the cleantech industry, triple bottom line is not only a practice that is embedded in his own company, but one he's always discussing and advocating.   

Thanks to all for tweeting the article! Follow AEB on Twitter @AdvElectrnBeams.